Fiona Crawley vs Dasha Plekhanova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Who shows better second serve performance in the past 6 months? Plekhanova slightly edges Crawley with a 38.31% versus 37.08% in winning points on second serves.
• In terms of returning opponents' second serves, Crawley is stronger, with a success rate of 55.41% compared to Plekhanova's 52.72%.
• Plekhanova outpaces Crawley in returning first serves, holding an advantage of 39.68% over Crawley's 37.23%.
• Under pressure, Crawley excels at saving breakpoints, with a rate of 46.48% compared to Plekhanova's 40.31%.
• Plekhanova has a higher overall match win rate over the past year at 65.22%, while Crawley's is 56.1%.
• Which surface favors Plekhanova? Clay is her preferred surface with a career win percentage of 65%, whereas Crawley performs best on Hard courts with a 73% win rate.
• Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. However, Plekhanova has a higher win rate at this level, achieving 62.07% compared to Crawley's 54.05%.
• When considering the quality of opponents, Crawley has faced slightly better-ranked players with an average position of 435.95, while Plekhanova's opponents average 446.48.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Plekhanova is more likely to prevail, having won 75% of such sets, while Crawley has won only 40%.
• Breakpoint conversion favors Plekhanova, who converts 45.63% of her chances, surpassing Crawley's conversion rate of 41.06%.

Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):

Plekhanova holds a slight edge in several key performance areas ahead of her match with Crawley. Her superior second serve point win percentage and dominant performance in returning first serves hint at a stronger baseline game.

While Crawley surpasses Plekhanova in breaking opponents' second serves and saving breakpoints, Plekhanova excels in converting breakpoint chances and closing matches in deciding sets. These factors can be decisive when both players are under pressure.

Considering surface preferences, Plekhanova's proficiency on clay might not be relevant if the current court surface is different, whereas Crawley thrives on hard courts. Additionally, Plekhanova's overall win rate in the last year suggests more consistent performance at their respective tournament levels.

Based on these comparisons, Plekhanova appears to be the more likely winner in this upcoming match. Her consistency and mental strength in crucial points provide a strategic advantage that could prove decisive.